CONTRIBUTORS

Marcus Weyerer, CFA
Director of ETF Investment Strategy EMEA
Franklin Templeton ETFs
Asia, a continent synonymous with diversity, dynamism, and economic ascendancy, has evolved to become a focal point for global investors seeking opportunities amidst a shifting financial landscape. Comprising a tapestry of cultures, economies, and geopolitical complexities, Asia stands at the crossroads of growth, innovation, and significant population dynamics. For 2024 for instance, the International Monetary Fund sees India grow by 6 percent and some ASEAN economies over 5%, compared to a global average of 3.1%.1 As investors navigate this diverse region, a noteworthy strategic shift is gaining prominence—the exclusion of China from Asian equity investments. The rationale behind strategically omitting China from investment portfolios is based on a growing recognition of China’s economic and political weight on the world stage, as well as its resulting unique challenges and opportunities. We focus on four pillars: improved diversification, geopolitical risk management and flexibility, the current tactical view of China, and increased exposure to smaller yet dynamic Asian economies.
2013 vs 2024: Weights in a Hypothetical FTSE All Asia Index* (%)
March 2024

Data as of 1 March 2024. Sources: FTSE 2023, Bloomberg and Franklin Templeton. *Hypothetical—the weights shown have been calculated on the basis of the FTSE All World Index, there is no FTSE All Asia Index available in the market. Indexes are unmanaged and one cannot invest directly in an index. Important data provider notices and terms available at www.franklintempletondatasources.com.
Improved Diversification
China’s rise over the past two decades or so has played a pivotal role in shaping Asia's economic narrative. Its rapid growth, technological advancements, and strategic importance have forced investors to reconsider their allocations to emerging markets and to Asia, in particular. Traditionally, most Asia indexes have excluded Japan, partially due to its dominance in market capitalisation, but also to account for Japan’s economic specificities. Currently, Japan accounts for roughly 41% of an All-Asia index. That is down 7 percentage points compared to ten years ago, but still too high for most investors’ understanding of a well-diversified allocation. China’s weight, meanwhile, has increased from 9 to 16%.2
Since in practice most investors already allocate Japan separately, this means China’s weight in ex-Japan allocations is has at times exceeded 30%. The country also accounts for over a quarter in emerging markets indexes.3 Increasingly, investors have begun to feel uncomfortable with such outsize influence of an individual market, regardless of their current tactical view of the country. From a portfolio construction and diversification perspective, it appears sensible to disaggregate Asia-ex Japan or emerging markets engagements further, and to manage allocations to China separately - for example with single-country ETFs. The decision to exclude both Japan and China strategically simply acknowledges the potential concentration risk associated with economic giants.
Geopolitical risk management and flexibility
Geopolitical tensions have been on the rise for years now, with the US-China relationship being under heavy pressure from a myriad of issues. Investors are also alert of risk scenarios that prior to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine appeared irrelevant or at the very least, far-fetched. There have been recent signs of a timid rapprochement between Washington and Beijing, but with a presidential election coming up in November, expectations of a comprehensive agreement on the superpowers’ multiple differences remain low. In fact, tail-risk events aside, for the years ahead investors ought to prepare for recurring bouts of volatility that are not driven by economics, but the geopolitical news flow. In such an environment, we believe that the concept of disaggregation will become more commonplace both among short-term traders and strategic investors. The option for flexibility and speed of execution in portfolio management will command a premium, even if the option is never exercised.
Country Exposures in Different Strategies, Relative Weights (%)
March 2024

Data as of March 2024. Sources: FTSE 2023, Bloomberg and Franklin Templeton.
Tactical views of China
China equities performance over the past five years has seen pronounced peaks and troughs, but overall, returns have been challenging. The FTSE Asia ex Japan ex China Index outperformed its Asia ex Japan pendant by 30% points over five years, 23 points over 3 years, and by 1 point year-to-date.4 We continue to have a constructive view of China’s long-term opportunities – a country in a multi-year transition that at times will be painful, but potentially lead to more sustainable, albeit lower, growth going forward. Many investors currently are more concerned about the numerous challenges and may consider tactically underweighting China – especially given its still-dominating weight in standard Asia and EM indexes. The country is not only at a different stage of the economic cycle than many other economies, but its entire economic model is quite unique. For investors who currently have cautious views of the short to medium term prospects, an ex-China allocation, combined with a single country broad China exposure can deliver the precision to better align their portfolios with their economic analysis.
Increased Exposure to Dynamic Asian Economies
Asia offers a diverse universe of economies that may be underappreciated in portfolios. India is one of the fastest growing major countries with solid short-term and long-term prospects. Taiwan and South Korea add first class technological capabilities that might shine bright again in 2024, while Hong Kong and Singapore are two of the world’s preeminent financial centres and trading hubs. Indonesia is the 4th most populous nation, boasts the largest economy in Southeast Asia and accounts for roughly one-fifth of global nickel reserves. It is poised to play a key role in the electric vehicle supply chain.
Many of the above nations are well-placed to benefit from the proliferating “China-plus-one” approach to manufacturing. Redistributing China’s index weights across some of these players makes sense not only from a diversification angle, but also from an economic point of view.
The decision to exclude China from standard exposures represents a fresh approach to Asia equity allocations. We believe, however, that there is a long-term case to be made beyond tactical considerations. China’s importance as a country and economy and its dominance in Asia and emerging market indices suggests that a separate view is warranted. Geopolitical tensions ebb and flow, but the emergence of a superpower besides the US will continue. China’s growth trajectory is slowing, consistent with the fact that it has progressed to become a middle-income country and is on the verge of moving into the high-income bracket. Some of its immediate and regional neighbours on the other hand are picking up speed. Asia as an economic entity will increasingly drive the world’s growth, and many of the economies offer investors opportunities that may not be well reflected in standard exposures.
Endnotes
- Source: International Monetary Fund, 2024.
- Source: FTSE, Franklin Templeton, 2023. Based on the FTSE All World Index
- Ibid.
- Source: FTSE, 12. Dec 2023. Indices compared are the FTSE Asia ex Japan ex China Index and the FTSE Asia Pacific ex Japan Australia and New Zealand Index
WHAT ARE THE RISKS?
All investments involve risks, including possible loss of principal.
Equity securities are subject to price fluctuation and possible loss of principal. International investments are subject to special risks, including currency fluctuations and social, economic and political uncertainties, which could increase volatility. These risks are magnified in emerging markets. Investments in companies in a specific country or region may experience greater volatility than those that are more broadly diversified geographically.
ETFs trade like stocks, fluctuate in market value and may trade above or below the ETF’s net asset value. Brokerage commissions and ETF expenses will reduce returns. ETF shares may be bought or sold throughout the day at their market price on the exchange on which they are listed. However, there can be no guarantee that an active trading market for ETF shares will be developed or maintained or that their listing will continue or remain unchanged. While the shares of ETFs are tradable on secondary markets, they may not readily trade in all market conditions and may trade at significant discounts in periods of market stress.
Commissions, management fees, brokerage fees and expenses may be associated with investments in ETFs. Please read the prospectus and ETF facts before investing. ETFs are not guaranteed, their values change frequently, and past performance may not be repeated.
Any companies and/or case studies referenced herein are used solely for illustrative purposes; any investment may or may not be currently held by any portfolio advised by Franklin Templeton. The information provided is not a recommendation or individual investment advice for any particular security, strategy, or investment product and is not an indication of the trading intent of any Franklin Templeton managed portfolio.
